Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Response to Great Awakening Prompt
In the 1730's and 40's religion had become laxed and less heated than what it had previously been only a few decades ago. Furthermore people had started to stop going to church, not really feeling a need to participate and include themselves in the congregation. But, when the revival spread people realized that they could have a personal relationship with God and that just going to church was not enough or maybe not even what you needed in your spiritual walk. Never before had these people known that there could be a separation of church and state and that the two didn't necessarily have to go together.
So, I think that once people got a small taste of what religious life could be like without the state and politics they took it to a national level. Making sure that there was not an official state or national church. I think that in the back of the populations mind they must have remembered that one of the initial reasons that their ancestors came over to America was because of their being forced to follow a mold, and with that in the back of their minds I think they realized that there was a better/fairer way to handle religion and politics as two separate arenas. I think that at this point when people had essentially given up on churches, and the revival came around people realized that religion was a personal thing and they wanted that. They wanted religion to be a personal/intimate thing that you could either support or choose to ignore. And if there was a state church people wouldn't have a personal choice.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
America
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Mayflower question 15
Questions 11 and 12
Question 12. I don't think that either side in King Phillip's War could claim moral superiority. In mind both sides did things that were despicable. I have no idea how the English could find it biblically justifiable to publicly display a chopped off head. On the natives side they didn't really have a bible or such document to go by God's standards, but I think that just by your conscience and moral ethics they should have realized that some of the things they did were gruesome. So, I don't think that either side had a claim to moral superiority.
Mayflower Questions 9 and 10
Question 10. Grouping the Indians together as one complicated the war because there were many Indians that had wanted to stay neutral. By the Pilgrims grouping all the Indians together as one unit, they shot themselves in the foot. Not only did they turn many Indian groups against them, they failed to keep their minds open to negotiations. I'm sure that if the Pilgrims had approached some of the Indian tribes they attacked they could have prevented many dead. By being unwilling to talk to Indians they also confused many of the surrounding Indian tribes. Tribes that thought they were on the Pilgrims side suddenly found them attacking their homes and lives, and that confused them. If you look at the Praying Indians who had always been with the Pilgrims, they were suddenly considered suspicious and banned for a while. So, had the Pilgrims been more careful and maybe even a little thoughtful of what they were doing, they would have had less heartache.
Questions 6 and 8
Question 8. In movies natives are always portrayed as being extremely violent and heathen, but they aren't. Natives have a way of living that is difficult for others to understand, that doesn't make it wrong or right. It just means that it's different. In the Mayflower we learn that the natives were willing to make peace with Pilgrims and to live side by side and at times help each other. We also learn that most of the natives at the end hadn't actually wanted to become involved in the war, and had wished to stay neutral. However, some of the images that we see today do seem to portray the natives in the Pilgrims time. In the book there were many instances in which the natives had scalped the Pilgrims after burning houses. This is still something that is commonly placed with natives today. Another thing that the Mayflower shows is the natives fascinating ability to pick up and move and thrive in another area. The natives never had permanent housing, so they could easily pick up and leave- something that would become very useful. Another things that Mayflower shows is that natives are a community like group, you wouldn't find just one Indian. They lived,worked, and thrived together. That also applied to when they were in war. The Indians did extremely well because they stayed together.
Mayflower Questions 4 and 5
Question 5. Squanto made such a difference in history because he was really smart. He knew what cards he had in his hand and he knew how to play them to the fullest of his ability. Squanto had the upper hand on almost everybody from the beginning by being both fluent in English and the Native tongue. He also had goals that he was focused on accomplishing, and although he never accomplished what he originally had planned. He still made quite a mess. Squanto had also been to Europe, which made his knowledge of the Pilgrims far superior to that of the local sachem. However, Squanto had grown suspicious among the natives which in the end would hinder him a great deal.
Mayflower Questions 1 and 3
Question 3. I think that America made pilgrims and their situation more of a fantasy because that's what they wanted to hear. Nobody really wants to believe that the Pilgrims had it rough when they came over, or that Thanksgiving wasn't a party. People want to believe that the Pilgrims came over and life fell into place for them. I also think that Pilgrim fantasy that we know today is somewhat encouraging. I mean as little kids in the 1st grade we are told this fantasy story of the Pilgrims, and they became the coolest people ever. We didn't want to know the struggles and hardships that they actually went through, and for the most part people still don't.
Songs 14 and 15 ( Last Two!!)
Songs 12 and 13
Songs 10 and 11
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Songs 8 and 9
Songs 6 and 7
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Songs 4 and 5
Songs 1-3
Monday, May 10, 2010
"The recent Gulf Coast Oil Spill is the issue I have decided to investigate."
( picture from here)
Right now it is said that the state of Louisiana has spend 5 million dollars towards the clean up of the spilling oil. However, that number is expected to quadruple next month at 20 million dollars. ( find here) You may be wondering "What has been done to fix the problem of the spilling oil?". Well, the spill hasn't been completely stopped however, there has been some progress in reducing the amount of oil reaching the sea. On May 18th the BP company inserted a siphon pipe into the leaking pipe. This act has allowed about 40% of the oil to be stopped from reaching the oil. ( found here) Unfortunately though, there is still major work to be done in order to completely eliminate the leaking oil.
(picture found here)
Not only have the worlds of the BP company been turned upside down, but the fishermen and residents of the affected states of the oil spill. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration has sealed off 19% of the Gulf Coasts' fishing grounds as un-fishable. ( found here) However, BP is expected to cover financial losses of fisherman, economic losses, etc. ( found here)
( fishermen waiting for contract with BP : here)
"Could the oil spill affect gas prices?" As of right now the current oil spill has not affected the gas prices and is not expected to unless the port stays closed for a long period of time. With the U.S. economy being so weak right now, the refining companies have a surplus of gas therefore, allowing the current oil spill not to currently affect gas prices. Peter Beutel, an analyst with Cameron Hanover in New Canaan, Conn, says that " Even if this were to increase gas prices by a nickel, it wouldn't be for more than a couple of days." ( info found here) In reality though, it's probably best just to wait and see what happens, since the countries economy is so up and down right now.
( oil spill here)
(question mark here)
"How does this topic relate on the International level?" Well, while the oil spill in the Gulf may not be affecting countries such as China, Japan, etc: it is affecting the U.S., which is known as a world power. And with the U.S.' economy already being in a crisis it really didn't need another major event take place. So, although it may not be a big impact on other countries and world powers the way the oil spill has affected the U.S. is likely to cause some effects in other countries, however big or small. This incident also serves as a great example to other countries that dig for oil in oceans. Particularly in how not to act, and how to act. So, one could look at this incident as a big learning experience for everyone, but that doesn't really make anybody fell better.
"I understand how our knowledge of the past is consturcted through analysis of primary sources of many kinds."
This is a picture of some bottles that came from the age of New Imperialism. We can see the New Imperialism from these bottles because in the article following the picture it tells us that one of the bottles won an award at the World's Fair in 1904. This image came from a website were they are selling reprints of old paper for various purposes. This website seems credible in that they give information about their product, they are actually selling this exact artifact so, in order to be credible they would have to do some research and give the truth about their products otherwise they would loose their credibility as a company and their customers.
This is an image of a Kaiser receiving submission from a Chinese envoy. Although the date of this picture isn't certain. One of the gentlemen in the picture is Kaiser Wilhelm II and since Wilhelm lived from 1859-1941, around the time of the New Imperialism. We can assume that this picture is during the time of the New Imperialism. It shows the themes of New Imperialism because you can see gentlemen coming together for an event from several different nationalities including: German, Japanese, and Chinese.
"I've learned that in many nations of the world face complex problems that they fell cannot be solved w/o international action or cooperation."
Just recently, as in like within the last month, I have learned that most countries have problems that they fell they cannot face without help. Some of these problems include pollution, trafficking, or an overflow of tourism. For instance, France is having a problem with too many tourist and illegal immigrants coming into their country. I think when looking at this problem it's easy to see why they would ask for international help. Both of these problems are directly related to the intervention of other countries help, by controlling borders and limiting the flow of travel etc. But what about a problem like pollution, most people would say that pollution is an individual countries problem, I mean it's not like China is helping pollute Costa Rica. Maybe the plea is more along the lines of "Let's find a solution and problem together, to help our country and yours." Maybe a country is having a hard time reducing their pollution because of the products they have to buy (gasoline, cars, etc.) or because of economic situations in which they cannot invest the money to improve the transportation or construction systems. So, sometimes it's not always that a country is asking for the other countries to fix their problem or make it better, but aid in ideas or financial help. ( we are tourists)
"I have become more knowledgable about the World."
( I was abducted from my home by the L.R.A. read this article)
( "Oh! Those bloody trenches!" check this out)
Today "race" is a topic/issue that many of us run into and encounter, whether it be somebody making fun of a race or people discriminating against a race. Unfortunately, many of us when thinking about race become uncomfortable and squeamish. It's not supposed to be that way, we aren't supposed to become that way, it shouldn't even be something we are uncomfortable to talk about, but that's the it is. I'm not going to lie, I don't like talking about race or racial issues either, but I think part of that is societies blame. I've grown up in a world where people are judged and looked upon by their skin color and chemical make up, but that doesn't make it right. Just because someone is different than yourself doesn't make that person inferior or less special it just makes them different.
("I am a turtle!" here's my pic)
( What better example of different cultures coming together than the Olympics.)